Case brefings on Mary Tiano vs Dillard store Essay

Case brefings on Mary Tiano vs Dillard store - Essay ExampleLater, Dillards appealed the findings of religious discrimination which was later reversed.The main issue of the case was termination of employment on the basis of religious discrimination whereby the Dillard Departmental Store did not find the exact of Mary Tianos pilgrimage to Medjugorje, Yugoslavia as sufficient ground for legitimate leave of absence from work.Title VII, 42 U.S.C. SS 2000e et seq. relates to the employment termination of an individual on the basis of their religious beliefs and states to discharge any individual . . . because of such individuals . . . religion (S 2000e-2(a)(1)). Title VII also defines religion as entirely aspects of religious posting and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employees or prospective employees religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employers business (S 2000e (j)).The case is relatively simple in its context as it involves full 3 main elements. Firstly, the plaintiff, Mary Tiano was a bonafide employee of Dillards in 1988 who worked as salesperson in the womens shoe department in its Park rally Mall, Arizona. She was a devout Roman Catholic which considerably influenced her life in general.Secondly, in 1988, the defendant, Dillards had an authorized policy of granting unpaid leave at managements discretion. They also discouraged vacation leave during their peak season period between October and December and had specific vacation policy that particularly forbid taking leave of absence during this time.It can be argued that Dillards had basically denied leave because of its no leave policy and also because it was not convinced of her spurring to meet her religious commitment or pilgrimage at Medjugorje, Yugoslavia at that particular time only and in the case of any accommodation that would be made at